是否可以从查询执行期间抛出的异常中自动恢复?
上下文:我正在开发一个spark应用程序,它从kafka主题中读取数据,处理数据,并输出到s3。但是,在生产环境中运行了几天之后,spark应用程序会遇到一些来自s3的网络故障,导致抛出异常并停止应用程序。值得一提的是,这个应用程序在kubernetes上运行时使用了gcp的sparkk8s操作符。
从我到目前为止看到的情况来看,这些异常很小,只需重新启动应用程序就可以解决问题。我们能否处理这些异常并自动重新启动结构化流式查询?
以下是引发异常的示例:
Exception in thread "main" org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.StreamingQueryException: Job aborted.
=== Streaming Query ===
Identifier: ...
Current Committed Offsets: ...
Current Available Offsets: ...
Current State: ACTIVE
Thread State: RUNNABLE
Logical Plan: ...
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StreamExecution.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$streaming$StreamExecution$$runStream(StreamExecution.scala:297)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StreamExecution$$anon$1.run(StreamExecution.scala:193)
Caused by: org.apache.spark.SparkException: Job aborted.
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$.write(FileFormatWriter.scala:198)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand.run(InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand.scala:159)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.DataWritingCommandExec.sideEffectResult$lzycompute(commands.scala:104)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.DataWritingCommandExec.sideEffectResult(commands.scala:102)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.DataWritingCommandExec.doExecute(commands.scala:122)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$execute$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:131)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$execute$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:127)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$executeQuery$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:155)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:151)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeQuery(SparkPlan.scala:152)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.execute(SparkPlan.scala:127)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.toRdd$lzycompute(QueryExecution.scala:80)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.toRdd(QueryExecution.scala:80)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter$$anonfun$runCommand$1.apply(DataFrameWriter.scala:676)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter$$anonfun$runCommand$1.apply(DataFrameWriter.scala:676)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$$anonfun$withNewExecutionId$1.apply(SQLExecution.scala:78)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withSQLConfPropagated(SQLExecution.scala:125)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withNewExecutionId(SQLExecution.scala:73)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.runCommand(DataFrameWriter.scala:676)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.saveToV1Source(DataFrameWriter.scala:285)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.save(DataFrameWriter.scala:271)
at io.blahblahView$$anonfun$11$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(View.scala:90)
at io.blahblahView $$anonfun$11$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(View.scala:82)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter$$anonfun$foreach$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:733)
at scala.collection.IndexedSeqOptimized$class.foreach(IndexedSeqOptimized.scala:33)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayOps$ofRef.foreach(ArrayOps.scala:186)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter.foreach(TraversableLike.scala:732)
at io.blahblahView$$anonfun$11.apply(View.scala:82)
at io.blahblahView$$anonfun$11.apply(View.scala:79)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.sources.ForeachBatchSink.addBatch(ForeachBatchSink.scala:35)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.MicroBatchExecution$$anonfun$org$apache$spark$sql$execution$streaming$MicroBatchExecution$$runBatch$5$$anonfun$apply$17.apply(MicroBatchExecution.scala:537)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$$anonfun$withNewExecutionId$1.apply(SQLExecution.scala:78)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withSQLConfPropagated(SQLExecution.scala:125)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withNewExecutionId(SQLExecution.scala:73)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.MicroBatchExecution$$anonfun$org$apache$spark$sql$execution$streaming$MicroBatchExecution$$runBatch$5.apply(MicroBatchExecution.scala:535)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.ProgressReporter$class.reportTimeTaken(ProgressReporter.scala:351)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StreamExecution.reportTimeTaken(StreamExecution.scala:58)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.MicroBatchExecution.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$streaming$MicroBatchExecution$$runBatch(MicroBatchExecution.scala:534)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.MicroBatchExecution$$anonfun$runActivatedStream$1$$anonfun$apply$mcZ$sp$1.apply$mcV$sp(MicroBatchExecution.scala:198)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.MicroBatchExecution$$anonfun$runActivatedStream$1$$anonfun$apply$mcZ$sp$1.apply(MicroBatchExecution.scala:166)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.MicroBatchExecution$$anonfun$runActivatedStream$1$$anonfun$apply$mcZ$sp$1.apply(MicroBatchExecution.scala:166)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.ProgressReporter$class.reportTimeTaken(ProgressReporter.scala:351)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StreamExecution.reportTimeTaken(StreamExecution.scala:58)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.MicroBatchExecution$$anonfun$runActivatedStream$1.apply$mcZ$sp(MicroBatchExecution.scala:166)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.ProcessingTimeExecutor.execute(TriggerExecutor.scala:56)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.MicroBatchExecution.runActivatedStream(MicroBatchExecution.scala:160)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StreamExecution.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$streaming$StreamExecution$$runStream(StreamExecution.scala:281)
... 1 more
Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: No such file or directory: s3a://.../view/v1/_temporary/0
at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.S3AFileSystem.getFileStatus(S3AFileSystem.java:993)
at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.S3AFileSystem.listStatus(S3AFileSystem.java:734)
at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:1517)
at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:1557)
at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.output.FileOutputCommitter.getAllCommittedTaskPaths(FileOutputCommitter.java:291)
at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.output.FileOutputCommitter.commitJobInternal(FileOutputCommitter.java:361)
at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.output.FileOutputCommitter.commitJob(FileOutputCommitter.java:334)
at org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetOutputCommitter.commitJob(ParquetOutputCommitter.java:48)
at org.apache.spark.internal.io.HadoopMapReduceCommitProtocol.commitJob(HadoopMapReduceCommitProtocol.scala:166)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$.write(FileFormatWriter.scala:187)
... 47 more
自动处理这些问题的最简单方法是什么?
2条答案
按热度按时间ars1skjm1#
不,没有可靠的方法可以做到这一点。顺便说一句,不也是一个答案。
检查异常的逻辑通常是通过在驱动程序上运行try/catch来实现的。
由于对于结构化流,spark框架本身已经标准地处理了executor级别的意外情况,并且如果错误是不可恢复的,那么应用程序/作业只是在将错误信号发送回驱动程序后崩溃,除非您在各种foreach构造中编写try/catch代码。
也就是说,对于foreach构造来说,不清楚微批次是否可以在这种方法中恢复,因为微批次的某些部分很可能丢失。但很难测试。
既然spark标准地迎合了您无法钩住的东西,那么为什么可以在程序源代码中插入循环或try/catch呢?同样地,广播变量也是一个问题——尽管有些人有相关的技术。但这不符合框架的精神。
所以,好问题,因为我想知道(在过去)。
omjgkv6w2#
在花了太多时间试图找到一个优雅的解决方案,但什么也没找到之后,下面是我的想法。
有人可能会说这是一个黑客,但它很简单,它的工作和解决了一个复杂的问题。我在生产环境中对它进行了测试,它解决了由于偶尔出现的小异常而导致的故障自动恢复问题。
我称之为查询看门狗。下面是看门狗将无限期重试运行查询的最简单版本:
有些人可能想替换
while(true)
使用某种计数器来限制重试次数。有人还可以补充这段代码,并在重试时通过slack或电子邮件发送通知。其他人可以简单地收集普罗米修斯的重试次数。希望有帮助,
干杯