Exception in thread "thread-finconfig-firstLoad-pool-0" java.lang.IllegalStateException: Invalid file="-authorityFilter,-catconsumerfilter,-catproviderfilter,-dashboardFilter,-fintech_monitor,-fqtracerconsumer,-fqtracerprovider,-frameworkAttachmentCleConfigValidationUtilsanFilter,-ft_monitor,-ft_tracer_consumer,-ft_tracer_provider,-grpcFilter,-healthcheckfilter,-hystrixconsumerfilter,-ratelimiterfilter,-serviceinfofilter,-strace_log_monitor,-tr_monitor,-tracecontextfilter,-ucsProviderFilter" is longer than 200
at org.apache.dubbo.config.utils.ConfigValidationUtils.checkProperty(ConfigValidationUtils.java:583)
at org.apache.dubbo.config.utils.ConfigValidationUtils.checkMultiName(ConfigValidationUtils.java:558)
at org.apache.dubbo.config.utils.ConfigValidationUtils.checkMultiExtension(ConfigValidationUtils.java:520)
at org.apache.dubbo.config.utils.ConfigValidationUtils.validateAbstractInterfaceConfig(ConfigValidationUtils.java:298)
at org.apache.dubbo.config.utils.ConfigValidationUtils.validateReferenceConfig(ConfigValidationUtils.java:344)
at org.apache.dubbo.config.ReferenceConfig.checkAndUpdateSubConfigs(ReferenceConfig.java:420)
at org.apache.dubbo.config.ReferenceConfig.init(ReferenceConfig.java:193)
at org.apache.dubbo.config.ReferenceConfig.get(ReferenceConfig.java:158)
7条答案
按热度按时间mcdcgff01#
case : The custom filter will be called circularly. The referer parameter can be used to destroy the closed loop, for example, to exclude some filters, but it may exceed the parameter length limit（ConfigValidationUtils.MAX_LEGTH）
3ks5zfa02#
Please submit a PR to fix it.
Be aware, however, that this may result in an overly long registry content.
ldxq2e6h3#
it is not easy to determine the proper length
332nm8kg4#
Is it more reasonable for filter SPI strength exclusion to provide a prefix matching parameter, for example, according to the package name, other scenarios are similar
olqngx595#
Is it more reasonable for filter SPI strength exclusion to provide a prefix matching parameter, for example, according to the package name, other scenarios are similar
Sounds good. But can we figure out all the cases?
nwo49xxi6#
Is it more reasonable for filter SPI strength exclusion to provide a prefix matching parameter, for example, according to the package name, other scenarios are similar
Sounds good. But can we figure out all the cases?
Well, yes, I feel that we can't take all the scenarios into consideration. However, it seems that there may be a large demand for customization of cluster and filter layer. Can we start with these two?
h4cxqtbf7#
Is it more reasonable for filter SPI strength exclusion to provide a prefix matching parameter, for example, according to the package name, other scenarios are similar
Sounds good. But can we figure out all the cases?
Well, yes, I feel that we can't take all the scenarios into consideration. However, it seems that there may be a large demand for customization of cluster and filter layer. Can we start with these two?
Sure