我正在尝试遵循on code.tuts指南,但总是收到错误。
以下是我的库规范:
require 'spec_helper'
describe Library do
before :all do
lib_arr = [
Book.new("JavaScript: The Good Parts", "Douglas Crockford", :development),
Book.new("Dont Make me Think", "Steve Krug", :usability),
]
File.open "books.yml", "w" do |f|
f.write YAML::dump lib_arr
end
end
before :each do
@lib = Library.new "books.yml"
end
describe "#new" do
context "with no parameters" do
it "has no book" do
lib = Library.new
expect(lib).to have(0).books
end
end
context "with a yaml file name parameters" do
it "has two books" do
expect(@lib).to_have(0).books
end
end
end
it "returns all the books in a given category" do
expect(@lib.get_books_in_category(:development).length).to eql 1
end
it "accepts new books" do
@lib.add_book(Book.new("Designing for the Web", "Mark Boulton", :design))
expect(@lib.get_book("Designing for the Web")).to be_an_instance_of Book
end
it "saves the library" do
books = @lib.books.map { |book| book.title}
@lib.save
lib2 = Library.new 'books.yml'
books2 = lib2.books.map { |book| book.title }
expect(books).to eql books2
end
end
我得到了have
是未定义的。我已经弄清楚了这是我的行
expect(@lib).to have(0).books
expect(lib).to have(0).books
我的语法过时了吗?我用谷歌搜索了一下,但找不到。
1条答案
按热度按时间zqry0prt1#
have
/have_exactly
、have_at_least
和have_at_most
匹配器已从RSpec 3中删除。它们现在位于单独的rspec-collection_matchers gem中。或者,就像zishe说的,你可以用
eq
代替have
/have_exactly
,用be >=
代替have_at_least
,用be <=
代替have_at_most
,而不用安装gem。来源:https://rspec.info/blog/2014/05/notable-changes-in-rspec-3/