Is it necessary that both the RM client and the TM client start a timer for reconnecting to seata server ?

lstz6jyr  于 22天前  发布在  其他
关注(0)|答案(2)|浏览(17)
  • I have searched the issues of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.

Ⅰ. Issue Description

Is it necessary that both rm client and tm client start a timer for reconnecting to seata server?

The log of 2 timeoutCheckers is as follows:
2023-02-13 10:12:51.547 INFO 4079 --- [eoutChecker_1_1] i.s.d.r.k8s.K8sRegistryServiceImpl
2023-02-13 10:12:51.917 INFO 4079 --- [eoutChecker_2_1] i.s.d.r.k8s.K8sRegistryServiceImpl
2023-02-13 10:13:01.547 INFO 4079 --- [eoutChecker_1_1] i.s.d.r.k8s.K8sRegistryServiceImpl
2023-02-13 10:13:01.916 INFO 4079 --- [eoutChecker_2_1] i.s.d.r.k8s.K8sRegistryServiceImpl

io.seata.core.rpc.netty.AbstractNettyRemotingClient#init
public void init() {
        timerExecutor.scheduleAtFixedRate(new Runnable() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
                clientChannelManager.reconnect(getTransactionServiceGroup());
            }
        }, SCHEDULE_DELAY_MILLS, SCHEDULE_INTERVAL_MILLS, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
wyyhbhjk

wyyhbhjk1#

Since the channels of RM and TM will not be shared, both will perform a reconnection detection, of course, this piece can be optimized

hgb9j2n6

hgb9j2n62#

I want to try and see if I can solve this, can you assign it to me?

相关问题