[Feature Request]iview does it thoroughly, and the response support does not specify a device to display or hide the function

e3bfsja2  于 4个月前  发布在  其他
关注(0)|答案(1)|浏览(58)

What problem does this feature solve?

bootstrap中有对响应式支持的 .visible-xs-* 、 .visible-sm-* 、 .visible-md-* 、 .visible-lg-* 、 .hidden-xs 、
.hidden-sm 、 .hidden-md 、 .hidden-lg 工具,可以指定在某种尺寸的设备上显示或隐藏元素,但是iview中没有见到,iview中的响应式支持目前能见到的也就是删格系统。既然支持响应式就做彻底,建议增加这些东西。虽然可以自己通过css3来设置,但是既然选择了使用iview,还是期待它能够更好地支持响应式,个人认为从技术角度来说这是它应该做的。

What does the proposed API look like?

支持类似bootstrap中的.visible-xs-* 、 .visible-sm-* 、 .visible-md-* 、 .visible-lg-* 、 .hidden-xs 、
.hidden-sm 、 .hidden-md 、 .hidden-lg功能

mepcadol

mepcadol1#

Translation of this issue:
What problem does this feature solve ###?
Bootstrap has response support for.Visible-xs-,.Visible-sm-,.Visible-md-,.Visible-lg-,.Hidden-xs,
.hidden-sm,.Hidden-md and.Hidden-lg tools can specify or display hidden elements on a device of a certain size, but no response support in iView is seen in iView. Since the support for the response is done thoroughly, it is suggested that these things be added. Although it can be set up by CSS3 itself, but since iView is chosen, it is expected that it can better support the response. Personally, it should be done from a technical point of view.
What does the proposed API look ### like?
Support.Visible-xs-,.Visible-sm-,.Visible-md-,.Visible-lg-,.Hidden-xs in similar bootstrap.
.hidden-sm,.Hidden-md,.Hidden-lg functions

相关问题